Equality elimination for the inverse method and extension procedures

We demonstrate how to handle equality in the inverse method using equality elimination. In the equality elimination method, proofs consist of two parts. In the first part we try to solve equations obtaining so called solution clauses. Solution clauses are obtained by a very refined strategy — basic superposition with selection function. In the second part, we perform the usual sequent proof search by the inverse method. Our approach is called equality elimination because we eliminate all occurrences of equality in the first part of the proof. Unlike the previous approach proposed by Maslov, our method uses most general substitutions, orderin

Which simple types have a unique inhabitant?

International audienceWe study the question of whether a given type has a unique inhabitant modulo program equivalence. In the setting of simply-typed lambda-calculus with sums, equipped with the strong βη-equivalence, we show that uniqueness is decidable. We present a saturating focused logic that introduces irreducible cuts on positive types "as soon as possible". Backward search in this logic gives an effective algorithm that returns either zero, one or two distinct inhabitants for any given type. Preliminary application studies show that such a feature can be useful in strongly-typed programs, inferring the code of highly-polymorphic library functions, or "glue code" inside more complex terms

Superposition as a logical glue

The typical mathematical language systematically exploits notational and logical abuses whose resolution requires not just the knowledge of domain specific notation and conventions, but not trivial skills in the given mathematical discipline. A large part of this background knowledge is expressed in form of equalities and isomorphisms, allowing mathematicians to freely move between different incarnations of the same entity without even mentioning the transformation. Providing ITP-systems with similar capabilities seems to be a major way to improve their intelligence, and to ease the communication between the user and the machine. The present paper discusses our experience of integration of a superposition calculus within the Matita interactive prover, providing in particular a very flexible, "smart" application tactic, and a simple, innovative approach to automation.Comment: In Proceedings TYPES 2009, arXiv:1103.311

The Undecidability of Simultaneous Rigid E-Unification

AbstractSimultaneous rigid E-unification was introduced in 1987 by Gallier, Raatz and Snyder. It is used in the area of automated reasoning with equality in extension procedures, like the tableau method or the connection method. Many articles in this area assumed the existence of an algorithm for the simultaneous rigid E-unification problem. There were several faulty proofs of the decidability of this problem. In this paper we prove that simultaneous rigid E-unification is undecidable. As a consequence, we obtain the undecidability of the ℶ∗-fragment of intuitionistic logic with equality